One crawl, two scores
The audit produces an SEO health score and a 16-point GEO readiness score from the same pass, so technical debt and AI readiness arrive as one list of fixes. Audits cost no credits, so re-running one after a fix is free.
Ahrefs is a research suite built on one of the largest web indexes in the industry, with AI-answer monitoring added through Brand Radar. Spyro AI measures where you stand in Google and inside AI answers, audits the site, then writes and publishes the content. Here is where they differ.
Eight capabilities that decide most evaluations. The detail sits in the full comparison further down.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Keyword research and rank tracking | Available | Available |
| Technical site audit | Available150–1,500 pages by plan, weekly and manual | Available100k to 5M crawl credits |
| AI visibility tracking | AvailableIn the plan | LimitedIncluded allowance, index from $199/mo |
| AI citations and share of voice | Available | Available |
| Sentiment on AI answers | AvailableCited answers, all 5 engines | AvailablePositive, neutral or negative |
| GEO audit and AI readiness score | Available16 checks | Not offeredTechnical SEO score, not GEO |
| Full article generation | AvailableIn the plan | Paid add-onAssistant, from $99/mo |
| Publishing to a CMS | AvailableWordPress, Shopify, Notion | Paid add-onWordPress and Notion via Agent A, $99/mo |
Four questions, answered before you read another row.
Both measure and analyze well. They part company at the point where an insight has to become a shipped page.
Prompts re-check weekly or daily, ranks and audits run weekly, and one keyword from every published article is tracked automatically, so this week's measurement decides next week's content.
Then it hands the writing off. Ahrefs has been adding execution: patching fixes to a site, scheduling social posts, submitting URLs to IndexNow, and Agent A, a separate $99/mo product, can publish to WordPress and Notion. None of that runs inside the core research subscription the way Spyro's loop does, and plenty of teams prefer their CMS kept well away from their analytics.
40 capabilities, grouped so you can open only the ones you care about. Where support comes with a caveat, the caveat is stated rather than rounded up to a tick.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Keyword research | Available21 credits a search | Available41.9B keyword database |
| Rank tracking | Available500 keywords per website, weekly | Available750 to 10,000 by plan |
| Technical site audit | Available150–1,500 pages by plan, no credit cost | Available100k to 5M crawl credits |
| Competitor analysis | Available5 domains a scan | AvailableIndex-wide |
| Search Console data | AvailableFree | AvailableGSC Insights |
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Prompt tracking | Available50 per site on Pro, 250 on Agency, metered | Available5 to 20 per account, plus check packs |
| Engines checkedAhrefs added Claude for custom prompts; each Claude check costs 8 of the plan's checks. | Available5, including Claude | Available7 documented, Grok paused |
| Check frequency | AvailableWeekly or daily, set per prompt | AvailableDaily, weekly or monthly |
| Prompt citations | AvailableCited in 3 of 5 checks, not a yes or no | AvailableCitations and share of voice |
| Cited sources | AvailableExact URLs and titles, and your place in the list | LimitedCitations reported, ordering not documented |
| Prompt mentions | Available30 days of every answer, cited or not | AvailableMentions metric, cited or not |
| Sentiment | AvailableOn cited answers, all 5 engines | AvailablePositive, neutral or negative |
| Share of voice in AI search results | AvailableRanked, with a You row | AvailableCompetitive benchmarking |
| AI Overview tracking | AvailablePer tracked keyword, no extra credits | AvailableSERP feature, not a separate index |
| AI referral traffic | AvailableVia GA4 | AvailableVia Web Analytics |
| AI visibility in the subscription | AvailableBoth plans, from the shared credit pool | LimitedOwn prompts included; index from $199/mo |
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| AI readiness score | AvailableBeside the SEO score | Not offeredTechnical SEO score, not GEO |
| Itemized GEO checks | Available16 named checks | Not offered170+ technical SEO checks, not GEO |
| AI crawler access | AvailableAudit plus free checker | LimitedObserved bot traffic, not access policy |
| llms.txt check | Available | LimitedNot in Site Audit's checks |
| Readable without JavaScript | AvailableScored as a GEO signal | LimitedRaw vs rendered HTML searchable via Page Explorer |
| Structured data | AvailableAudit plus free validator | LimitedValidates syntax, not AI-type presence |
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Full article generationAI Content Helper edits a draft you supply. Agent A, a separate $99/mo product, drafts pages and content across marketing tasks generally, but is not documented as generating a complete, keyword-targeted SEO article the way this row means. | Available261 credits an article | LimitedOptimizes a draft you supply |
| In-editor optimization | AvailableIn the plan | Paid add-onFree tier, then $99 or $299/mo |
| Content plan and calendar | AvailableRolling 30-article plan, free | LimitedResearch and ideas |
| Automatic internal linking | AvailableInserted while writing | LimitedReported; inserted via Patches, a Max Project Boost add-on |
| Article images | Available1 featured plus 2 in-content | LimitedAlt text via Patches, a Max Project Boost add-on |
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| WordPress | AvailableSelf-hosted and .com | Paid add-onVia Agent A, $99/mo, not the core SEO plans |
| Shopify and Notion | Available | Paid add-onNotion via Agent A, $99/mo; its integrations don't extend to Shopify |
| Webhook publishing | AvailableSigned, for headless stacks | Not offeredAgent A connects to named apps, not generic webhooks |
| Scheduled article publishing | AvailableOn the content calendar | LimitedAgent A publishes automatically, not from a content calendar |
| Recurring checks without manual runs | AvailablePlus a Monday digest | Available |
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| SEO and GEO in one report | AvailableOne crawl, two scores | LimitedOne health score, SEO only |
| PDF export | AvailableAlso from the free tools | Available |
| Scheduled digest email | AvailableRanks plus citations, weekly, built in | LimitedScheduled reports you assemble |
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Seats | AvailableUnlimited, both plans | Limited1 included, extras $40 to $80/mo |
| Websites or projects | Available10 on Pro, unlimited on Agency | Available5 to 100 projects by plan |
| Search Console and GA4 | AvailableBoth, free | LimitedGSC Insights, own Web Analytics |
| Public API | AvailablePer-website keys | AvailableUncapped on Enterprise |
| Free tools without an account | Available5 tools | AvailableFree tier and tools |
Four capability differences, stated as fit rather than as a verdict on Ahrefs.
The audit produces an SEO health score and a 16-point GEO readiness score from the same pass, so technical debt and AI readiness arrive as one list of fixes. Audits cost no credits, so re-running one after a fix is free.
All five assistants on both plans, with no index to buy separately. Checks draw on the same credit pool as research and writing, so a quiet content month funds a heavier tracking month.
Spyro keeps thirty days of verbatim answers: the exact snippet, the sources linked, and the sentiment classified on each cited answer. That is the raw material behind the score, not only the score itself.
A gap in the audit becomes a planned article: content generation for AI search built with internal links and images, published to WordPress, Shopify or Notion, and its target keyword tracked from then on.
As listed by each vendor in August 2026. Prices change, so check the live pages before you commit.
Putting $99 next to $129 and declaring a winner would be dishonest, because the two prices do not buy the same thing. The useful question is which of these capabilities you are currently paying for twice.
Neither product is the right answer for everyone, and the split falls along fairly clean lines.
Plenty of teams run both, and that is a reasonable outcome rather than a failure of the comparison. If you do, the thing worth checking is which capabilities you are paying for in both places.
The questions that come up most often when teams weigh these two, including the ones where the answer is not in our favour.
For some teams, yes. For link-led SEO work it is not. Spyro covers keyword research, rank tracking, technical and GEO auditing, AI visibility, content and publishing. It does not cover backlink research at index scale, index-wide topic research, or very large site crawls. For a team that wants Brand Radar-style AI-answer tracking with ChatGPT, ranking and content publishing built into one subscription, Spyro is the Ahrefs alternative built for that, and it replaces the need to run a separate SEO tool and a separate AI-visibility index for teams whose needs fit inside its scope.
Ahrefs' Lite plan is $129/mo with 1 seat and 5 tracked AI prompts, extra seats $40 to $80/mo, on top of one of the largest keyword and backlink indexes in the industry. Spyro's $99/mo Pro plan includes unlimited seats and all 5 AI engines out of the box. For an agency managing several client sites on one login, Spyro's flat per-plan pricing removes the per-seat cost; for research-heavy teams doing deep backlink or keyword work at scale, Ahrefs' index remains the stronger tool regardless of team size.
For a solo founder or small agency, Spyro's $99/mo covers SEO, AI visibility, GEO auditing and content publishing with unlimited seats. Ahrefs' comparable AI-visibility coverage means adding the Brand Radar index from $199/mo on top of a research plan. If the priority is tracking and acting on AI-search visibility without assembling multiple subscriptions, Spyro is the lower-cost path; if deep backlink and keyword research is the core need, Ahrefs' entry plans are already built for that budget.
Yes, this is what Ahrefs was built for: a 41.9B-keyword database, a technical Site Audit (100k to 5M crawl credits) and Content Explorer for topic research are core to every paid plan. Its AI Content Helper optimizes a draft you supply rather than generating a full keyword-targeted article, and content planning is research and ideas rather than a rolling calendar. Spyro covers the same SEO ground at a smaller scale (500 keywords per site, 500-page crawls) alongside a GEO audit Ahrefs does not offer.
No. Spyro does not fetch or display a backlink profile. It covers keyword research, rank tracking, technical and GEO auditing, AI visibility, content and publishing. For index-scale backlink research, Ahrefs remains the stronger tool.
Spyro tracks five on every plan: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. Ahrefs documents seven: Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, with Grok paused while its policy changes are resolved. Claude on Ahrefs is available for custom prompts and each check draws 8 of your plan's checks, so on Lite's 150 checks a month the practical question is how much Claude coverage you can afford rather than whether it is available.
On Spyro it is included and metered from the shared credit pool at 10 credits per prompt per assistant, or 20 for Claude. Ahrefs includes an allowance of your own tracked prompts on every paid plan from Lite up, 5 to 20 prompts and 150 to 600 checks a month, where one check is one prompt on one engine in one location. Its organic prompt index is the separate purchase, from $199 a month per platform to $699 for all of them, and extra checks are sold in packs from $50.
Weekly or daily, set individually for each prompt, with a location per prompt. A prompt is also checked immediately when you add it, and you can re-run one on demand.
Yes. Publish targets are self-hosted WordPress, WordPress.com, Shopify, Notion and signed webhooks. Articles publish immediately or on a scheduled date, with a table of contents, an author block, JSON-LD schema and Yoast or RankMath meta fields.
Up to 10 on Pro and unlimited on Agency. Each website has its own audits, keywords, prompts, calendar and integrations, and they all draw on one shared credit pool, so there is no per-site fee.
They were checked in August 2026 against the Ahrefs website and help center, and against the Spyro codebase for our own numbers. Both products change often, so check the live pricing pages before you commit.
Spyro writes GEO optimized articles, links them, and auto publishes to your CMS so AI engines and Google put your brand in front of buyers first.